Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vitaliy Sachko vs Daniel Masur Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sachko vs Masur analysis and find out who is favored!
Vitaliy Sachko vs Daniel Masur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sachko 1 - 0 Masur
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sachko has won 49.39% of points on their second serve, while Masur has won 52.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sachko, in recent form, has won 49.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Masur has won 51.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.84% and 31.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sachko has saved 59.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Masur has saved 64.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sachko has won 51.85% of matches played (W/L 28/ 26), with Masur winning 67.14% (W/L 47/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sachko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Masur has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 134/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Sachko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19), where as Masur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sachko winning 1 times and Masur being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sachko winning 2 and Masur winning 1. The last match between Sachko and Masur was at the Ismaning Challenger, 12-10-2022, Second, Carpet with Vitaliy Sachko getting the victory 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sachko and Masur have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sachko winning 1 times and Masur 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sachko winning 0, and Masur 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sachko has played against opponents with an average rank of 257.74 while Masur has played against players with an average rank of 198.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sachko has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Masur has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sachko has converted 41.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Masur has converted 44.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
195
Rank
156
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
295
Rank
176
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
58% (304-220)
Career Total W/L
58% (384-279)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
78% (32-9)
$154,400
Career Prize Money
$151,200
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Vitaliy Sachko | Daniel Masur |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:10:39 | 2:10:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (55/97) | 68% (64/94) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (45/55) | 69% (44/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (22/42) | 37% (11/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 11% (1/9) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (39/94) | 31% (30/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Daniel Masur
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
13
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
30 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vitaliy Sachko | Daniel Masur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 78% (32/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (14/19) | 74% (70/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (159/166) | 57% (538/401) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 60% (3/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 85% (28/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.48 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 222 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 106 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:50 | 1:41:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 350.8 | 178 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (678/1089) | 65% (1858/2853) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (435/678) | 76% (1406/1858) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (203/411) | 52% (518/995) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (45/109) | 44% (131/296) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (412/1035) | 40% (1180/2978) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 82% (9/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (23/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (6/13) | 78% (32/41) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 67% (12/18) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 54% (7/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 88% (34/30) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 12% (34/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 29% (7/2) |
Vitaliy Sachko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
48%
(
46 of
95)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
93)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
65%
(
32 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
30 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Norbert Gombos
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
82)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Francesco Passaro
63%
(
77 of
122)
1st Serve %
77%
(
89 of
116)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
51 of
89)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
52 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
116)
123
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
53 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
67%
(
10 of
15)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
11
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Daniel Masur
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Lucas Gerch
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Vilius Gaubas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Daniel Masur
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
111)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel Masur
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Theo Papamalamis
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sachko Vs Masur Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
